|
COURSE
SCHEDULE
SECTION
I: THEORIZING GLOBAL' AND FEMINISM(S)'
1. 9/4: Introduction
to the course
2. 9/9: Gender and
Global Issues #1
- Tsitsi Dangarembga.
1996. Nervous Conditions.
- Seager #30
3. 9/11: NO CLASS
- Attend at least one session of the Sept. 11th Program at Drew
Holiday: MONDAY,
SEPTEMBER 16th - NO CLASS
4. Tuesday, 9/17:
Gender and Global Issues #2
- Tsitsi Dangarembga.
1996. Nervous Conditions.
- Ayesha Imam,
Simon Matsvai, and Jan Reynders, "Evaluating A Social Change
Network: Women in Law and Development in Africa" in Measuring
the Immeasurable: Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation of Networks,
edited by Marilee Karl with Anita Anand, Floris Blankenberg, Allert
Van Den Ham, Adrian Saldanha, pages 151-157.
- Seager #9, 21,
27
- Film: "Women
with Open Eyes" (Femmes Aux Yeux Ouverts)
5. Wednesday 9/18:
What is Global about Feminisms? #1
- Bunch, Charlotte.
1987. "Bringing the Global Home." In Passionate Politics:
Feminist Theory in Action. New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 328-345.
- Seager #2
6. 9/23: What is
Global about Feminisms? #2
- Uma Narayan,
"Contesting Cultures" (Chapter 1) [DC]
- Anderson, Benedict.
1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of
Nationalism. New York: Verso, pp. 5-8.
- Abstract #1 DUE
(for reading #'s 5 & 6)
7. 9/25: Is feminism
"Western"? #1
- Uma Narayan,
"Restoring History and Politics to Third-World Traditions'"
(Chapter 2). [DC]
- Uma Narayan,
"Through the Looking-Glass Darkly" (Chapter 4). [DC]
- Abstract #2 DUE
(for reading #7)
SECTION II: HISTORICIZING FEMINISM
8. 9/30: Navigating
colonialism and nationalism - Indian feminism #1
- Georgina Waylen.
1996. "Colonialism" in Gender in Third World Politics, pp.46-69.
Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
- Raka Ray. Fields
of Protest. Pages 1-44.
9. 10/2: Navigating
colonialism and nationalism - Indian feminism #2
- Raka Ray. Fields
of Protest. Pages 45-101.
- Seager #6
10. 10/7: Navigating
colonialism and nationalism - Indian feminism #3
- Raka Ray. Fields
of Protest. Pages 102-167.
- Film: "Made
in India" ON CHANNEL 20.
- Everyone must
hand in Abstract #3 DUE (for 8-10, include a separate entry for the
Waylen article and one longer entry for Ray book)
SECTION III: POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, CULTURAL CHANGE AND WOMEN'S RIGHTS
11. 10/9: Gender
and War #1
- Bumiller, Elisabeth.
1999. "Crimes: Kosovo Victims Must Choose to Deny Rape or Be
Hated." The New York Times 22, June. <http://search.nytimes.com>.
- Rohde, David.
1999. "Crimes: Albanian Tells How Serbs Chose Her, 'the Most
Beautiful One,' for Rape." The New York Times 1, May. <http://search.nytimes.com>.
- Enloe, Cynthia.
2000. "When Soldiers Rape," In Maneuvers: The International
Politics of Militarizing Women's Lives. 108-152, notes 329-346.
- Film: Calling
the Ghosts
12. 10/14: Gender
and War #2
- Moon, Katharine
H.S., 1997. Sex Among Allies: Military Prostitution in U.S.-Korean
Relations. New York: Columbia University Press. Pages 1-47.
13. 10/16: Gender
and War #3
- Enloe, Cynthia.
2000. "How do they Militarize a Can of Soup?" In Maneuvers:
The International Politics of Militarizing Women's Lives. 1-34, notes
301-312.
- "Twelve
Points: Stop the War, REBUILD a just Society in Afghanistan and Support
Women's Human Rights." Accessed on 7/2/02. http://www.whrnet.org/activists/twelvepoints/statement_2.htm.
- Abeysekera, Sunila,
"Paying the Price for Ignoring Women's Calls Against Fundamentalism"
from the Cat's Eye Column in The Island, and English Daily Paper published
in Sri Lanka. October 31, 2001. http://www.whrnet.org/activists/crucial_statements/asia_pacific/paying.htm
Accessed on 7/2/02.
- Statement by
RAWA - Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan. http://www.whrnet.org/activists/crucial_statements/asia_pacific/rawa.htm.
Accessed on 7/2/02.
14. 10/21: Gender
and War #4 - The Cambodian Case
- Loung Ung. 2000.
First They Killed My Father:
15. 10/23: Gender
and War #5 - The Cambodian Case
- Loung Ung. 2000.
First They Killed My Father:
- Seager page 73
- Listen to the
radio program on gender and the international criminal court so we
can discuss it in class
16. 10/28: Gender
and War #6 - The Cambodian Case
- Loung Ung. 2000.
First They Killed My Father:
- Seager #34
- Listen to tape
of Loung Ung's 2001 talk at Drew
- Paper DUE (analysis
of readings #s 11-16)
17. 10/30: Development/Globalization
#1
- V. Spike Peterson
and Anne Sisson Runyan. 1999. Global Gender Issues, 2nd edition, p.130-147.
Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- Grace Chang.
2000. "Global Exchange: The World Bank, "Welfare Reform,"
and the Trade in Migrant Women." In Disposable Domestics: Immigrant
Women Workers in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: South End Press,
pages 123-154.
- Seager #22, 28,
29
- Abstract # 4
DUE (for reading 17)
18. 11/4: Development/Globalization
#2
- Tiano, Susan.
1990. "Maquiladora Women: A New Category of Workers?" In
Women Workers and Global Restructuring, ed. Kathryn Ward. Ithaca,
NY: ILR Press, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University,
pp. 193-223.
- Kwong, Peter.
1997. "American Sweatshops 1980s Style: Chinese Women Garment
Workers." In Women Transforming Politics: An Alternative Reader,
ed. Cathy J. Cohen, Kathleen B. Jones and Joan C. Tronto. New York:
New York University Press, pp. 84-93.
- Seager # 23,
24, 25
- Film: Made In
Thailand or ESPN Nike Video.
19. 11/6: Development/Globalization
#3
- Siriporn Skrobanek,
Nattaya Boonpakdi, Chutima Janthakeero, "Features of the Traffic
in Women" in The Traffic in Women: Human Realities of the international
Sex Trade, New York: Zed Books, Ltd., pages 29-36.
- Kamala Kempadoo,
"Continuities and Change: Five Centuries of Prostitution in the
Caribbean." In Sun, Sex, and Gold: Tourism and Sex Work in the
Caribbean, edited by Kamala Kempadoo. New York: Rowman & Littlefield
Publishers, Inc., 1999.
- Seager #18
- Abstract # 5
DUE (for reading #s 18 & 19)
20. 11/11: Fundamentalism
#1
- Lynn P. Freedman,
"The Challenge of Fundamentalisms," Reproductive Health
Matters No. 8 (November 1996): pp. 55-69.
- John Stratton
Hawley. 1999. "Fundamentalism" in Religious Fundamentalisms
and the Human Rights of Women, edited by Courtney Howland. Pp. 3-8.
New York: St. Martin's Press.
- Courtney Howland.
1999. "Introduction," in Religious Fundamentalisms and the
Human Rights of Women, edited by Courtney Howland. ONLY PAGES xi-xiii.
- Seager #11, 12
21. 11/13: Fundamentalism
#2
- In Religious
Fundamentalisms and the Human Rights of Women, articles by: Susan
Rose, "Christian Fundamentalism: Patriarchy, Sexuality, and Human
Rights", p. 9-20; Marie-Aimée Hélie-Lucas, "What
is your Tribe: Women's Struggles and the Construction of Muslimness",
p. 21-32; Lynn Freedman, "Finding Our Feet, Standing Our Ground:
Reproductive Health Activism in an Era of Rising Fundamentalism and
Economic Globalization", p. 181-192.
- Seager #7
- Abstract # 6
DUE (for reading # 20 & 21)
SECTION IV: ORGANIZING FOR CHANGE
22. 11/18: Creating
Communities?
- Leila J. Rupp,
"Constructing Internationalism: The Case of Transnational Women's
Organizations, 1888-1945," The American Historical Review 99,
no. 5 (December 1994): pp.1571-1600.
- Seager #32
23. 11/20: The United
Nations as a Vehicle for Women's Organizing
- Hilkka Pietilä.
January 1999. "Engendering the Global Agenda: A Success Story
of Women and the United Nations." INSTRAW Occasional Paper No.
1, p. 21-40 & 50.
- Convention on
the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women.
- "Platform
for Action," in Beijing!: UN Fourth World Conference on Women,
ed. Anita Anand and Gouri Salvi (New Delhi, India: Women's Feature
Service, 1998), pp. 27-33.
- Film: Friday,
November 17th at 8:00pm or Sunday, November 19th at 7:00pm - "To
Empower Women: the Beijing Conference"
- Abstract # 7
DUE (for reading #s 22 & 23)
24. 11/25: The United
Nations as a Vehicle for Women's Organizing
- Dutt, Mallika.
2000. "Some Reflections on United States Women of Color and the
United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women and NGO Forum in Beijing,
China." In Global Feminisms Since 1945: Rewriting Histories,
edited by Bonnie G. Smith, New York: Routledge.
- Bunch, Charlotte,
and Niamh Reilly. 1994. Demanding Accountability: The Global Campaign
and Vienna Tribunal for Women's Human Rights. New Brunswick, NJ: The
Center for Women's Global Leadership and the United Nations Development
Fund for Women (UNIFEM), pp. 2-16, 84-108.
- Film: "The
Vienna Tribunal" on Channel 20
NO
CLASS - WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 27
25. 12/2: Transnational
Communities #1
- Nawal H. Ammar
and Leila S. Lababidy, "Women's Grassroots Movements and Democratization
in Egypt," in Democratization and Women's Grassroots Movements,
edited by Jill M. Bystydzienski and Joti Sekhon, 1999, pages 150-170.
- Charlotte Bunch
and Claudia Hinojosa. 2000. "Lesbians Travel the Roads of Feminism
Globally." Mexico: Center for Women's Global Leadership, Rutgers
University.
- Seager #5
26. 12/4: Transnational
Communities #2
- Nancy Saporta
Sternbach, et al., The Making of Social Movements in Latin America:
Identity, Strategy, and Democracy, Political Economy and Economic
Development in Latin America, (Chapter 12) (Boulder, CO: Westview
Press, 1992).
- Marieme Helie-Lucas,
"An International Solidarity Network: Women Living Under Muslim
Laws" in Measuring the Immeasurable: Planning, Monitoring and
Evaluation of Networks, edited by Marilee Karl with Anita Anand, Floris
Blankenberg, Allert Van Den Ham, Adrian Saldanha, pages 38-42.
- Seager pages
94-95
- Abstract # 8
DUE (for reading #s 25 & 26)
|
|
ASSIGNMENTS:
Attendance
and Participation:
This course will be run as a seminar and its success is consequently
dependent upon your level of commitment and preparedness. Therefore,
you are required to come prepared to discuss the readings. If you have
difficulty speaking up in class, please let me know and we will discuss
ways to help you participate.
Reading Response
Journal:
You will be required to analyze the readings and films by keeping a
reading response journal. Your journal entries on each article and each
film shown on Channel 20 should be approximately one-paragraph in length.
In each entry, you will have to write on no more than four articles/films.
If there are more than four articles assigned for a particular entry
you can choose four to write on.
In this journal you will briefly synthesize the main argument of an
article and then briefly discuss your thoughts about the argument: Did
you agree or disagree? Why? What about this article did you think was
important or unimportant? Doing this in one paragraph will require careful
thought as it is necessary to read and think about the article before
writing. After talking about all of the articles assigned for that entry
you should end your entry by writing a one paragraph analysis of a theme
or issue raised in the articles. The goal of this paragraph is to connect
the articles to one another. In this paragraph you could also raise
questions that you are left with after reading the assigned material.
These reading response
journals will be graded +, , or - . Minuses do not count toward your
final grade. Your final grade for the journals will be determined by
the following formula:
If you turned in 9 or more entries = B; if 5 or more of these 9 are
+ = A
If you turned in 8 or more entries = C; if 5 or more of these 8 are
+ = B
If you turned in 7 or more entries = D; if 5 or more of these 7 are
+ = C
All Journal entries
should be typed. Due dates for the entries and the readings they cover
are listed on the syllabus. NO LATE ENTRIES WILL BE ACCEPTED. Since
late entries will not be accepted, I have assigned a total of 11 entries
so that you have some room for absences or minuses. If you decide not
to turn in two entries early in the semester and then get sick later
in the semester, this above policy will still stand.
Group Issue
Project:
Each student will participate in a group project with 4 other members
of the class. The groups will each select an issue of concern to feminists.
The issue can fall under the broad rubric of reproductive rights (e.g.,
abortion, sexual rights, reproductive health), sexual violence, trafficking
in women, political rights, lesbian rights, rights of indigenous women
or women of color, war and peace (e.g., participation in nationalist
movement, participation in the military, violence against women during
war, rape as a war crime, etc.), religious freedom, use of human rights
instruments (CEDAW, etc.), economic rights (women workers in foreign-owed
factories, economic status of women, participation in the informal sector,
micro-enterprise, etc.). As a group, you will analyze why this issue
is significant and present the ways that your issue has been conceived
and acted on by feminists. In picking your issue, you will need to be
clear about which groups of feminists you are talking about (either
defined by geographic region or by identity characteristics). As a group,
you make a presentation to the class that will take up the last 30 minutes
of class on the designated day.
Your presentation
should include the following:
1) You should be sure and draw appropriate connections between course
readings and the topic you have chosen. In addition to linking your
presentation to the course readings on the day you are doing your presentation,
you should use the theoretical articles we have discussed to help you
analyze the issue you are examining.
2) You should find
out what's going on in relation to this issue now. Look in major news
sources (e.g. The New York Times, The Washington Post) and at relevant
web sites. You're looking for articles which offer substantial information
and analysis not just a mention or a couple of paragraphs. Don't just
choose any article about the topic but make sure it's clear to you how
it's related to and expands our understanding of the assigned readings.
3) You should look
for organizations that are working on the issue. Be prepared to tell
the class what the organizations do, perhaps show us specific information
from an organizations web site or literature if available, and be prepared
to talk about the organization's strategy for addressing the issue or
question about which you've been reading.
4) You should prepare a handout for the class which might include a
copy of or excerpts from a news story you found; an excerpt from information
about or literature from the organization and questions or key points
you want the class to consider in discussion. If you would like me to
make copies for the class, I must have your handout no later than one
class before the one in which you are doing your presentation. In addition,
you should hand out a short annotated bibliography to the class with
the most important sources on your topic (1-2 pages).
Finally, each group
is responsible for a written analysis of their findings. This paper
should be approximately 8 pages in length and is DUE IN CLASS ON THE
DAY OF YOUR PRESENTATION. LATE PAPERS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. The paper
should briefly present the "facts" of how the issue has been
conceived by the groups of feminists you are looking at and should analyze
the issue. The paper should explicitly analyze the issue by connecting
it to the theoretical issues and materials presented in class. Questions
to consider are: How and why has the issue been dealt with in this way?
What is at stake in the debate over the issue? Do different groups of
feminists see the issue differently? Why is the issue of concern to
feminists?
A one-page topic
overview is DUE ON OCTOBER 4th. In addition, each group should meet
with me at least one week before their scheduled presentation. While
you will be graded as a group on this project, you will each be asked
to grade the participation of others in your group. The average of grades
given to you by your colleagues will be incorporated into your final
grade on the project as well as your participation grade for the course.
Critical Response
Papers:
(2) 5-6 page papers. Papers must present a critical response to questions
and issues raised in the assigned readings. Papers must be concise and
should not simply repeat or summarize arguments of the readings. Paper
1 is DUE ON IN CLASS ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 18th and the second paper
is DUE BY 3:00 P.M. MONDAY, DECEMBER 11th.
Critical Response Paper #1: In the first short paper you will
reflect on the primary theoretical issues discussed during the first
few weeks of class and apply them to our readings and discussions about
feminism in India.
Critical Response
Paper #2: Write a paper answering the question: What is "global"
about feminism(s)? In this paper you will make an argument about the
relationship between the global factors we've discussed, the organizing
efforts we've reviewed, and feminism. In doing so, you should reflect
on the theoretical frameworks and analytic perspectives we have reviewed
in class (including books, packet readings, films, etc.). In exploring
the relationship between feminism and various global factors, you should
be conscious of the extent to which you are arguing that issues or approaches
are the same across regions or whether there are simply commonalities
across regions. Be sure and specify where and how you see sameness and/or
commonalities by using examples from course material. This paper is
an attempt to get you to think critically about the whole of course
materials and as such you are expected to use theoretical perspectives
and issues from various parts of the class.
Course Evaluation:
In-class Participation and Attendance - 15%
Reading Journal - 30%
Group Issue Project (presentation and paper) - 15%
Critical Response papers - 40% (20% each)
|